Choosing practice material for the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27035 Lead Incident Manager exam should not feel like a gamble. CertkingdomPDF backs its 80 practice questions for the ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager exam with expert-verified answers and a free, printable demo, giving you a clear look at the product long before checkout.
PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Exam Overview:
| Certification Vendor: | PECB |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27035 Lead Incident Manager Exam |
| Exam Number: | ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager |
| Exam Duration: | 180 minutes |
| Related Certifications: | PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27035 Incident Manager PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27035 Provisional Incident Manager PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27035 Senior Lead Incident Manager |
| Available Languages: | Chinese (varies by provider), Korean, French, Arabic, Spanish, German, English |
| Passing Score: | 70% |
| Real Exam Qty: | 80 |
| Exam Price: | Varies by region and training provider (typically USD 500–1200 equivalent when bundled with training) |
| Exam Format: | Multiple-choice questions, Scenario-based questions |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 3 years (renewable via PECB certification maintenance process) |
| Recommended Training: | PECB ISO/IEC 27035 Lead Incident Manager Training Course |
| Exam Registration: | PECB Official Certification Exams Information |
| Sample Questions: | ![]() |
| Exam Way: | Computer-based proctored exam (online or onsite depending on provider) |
| Pre Condition: | Basic knowledge of information security principles, incident management processes, and ISO/IEC 27000 series standards recommended |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://pecb.com/en/education-and-certification-for-individuals/iso-iec-27035/iso-iec-27035-lead-incident-manager |
PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Exam Syllabus Topics:
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Topic 1: Designing and developing an organizational incident management process | |
| Topic 2: Improving incident management processes and continual improvement | |
| Topic 3: Fundamental principles and concepts of information security incident management | |
| Topic 4: Information security incident management process based on ISO/IEC 27035 | |
| Topic 5: Preparing and executing incident response plans | |
| Topic 6: Implementing incident management processes and managing incidents |
Frequently Asked Questions About the ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Exam
The ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager exam is the official test for the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27035 Lead Incident Manager certification from PECB. It measures whether you can apply the skills described in the exam objectives to realistic scenarios. Earning the credential shows employers that your knowledge has been checked against a recognized industry standard, which is why many candidates treat it as essential armor in a competitive job market.
The passing score for the ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager exam is 70%, and the exam fee is Varies by region and training provider (typically USD 500–1200 equivalent when bundled with training). Because retakes mean paying the fee again, most candidates prefer to prepare thoroughly first — working through practice questions with expert-verified answers until the exam format feels familiar is a common approach.
CertkingdomPDF focuses on doing a few things well: practice questions aligned with the real ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager exam format, answers verified by experienced experts, free updates for 365 days after purchase, and a support team available around the clock. You can check all of this yourself before buying, because every product page offers a free demo that you can download and even print. There is no pressure and no obligation — the demo exists so you can make up your own mind.
You can register for the ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager exam through the official channels below:
Registration slots can fill quickly during busy periods, so booking early is recommended once your preparation is on track.
According to the official outline, the main domains of the ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager exam include:
- Preparing and executing incident response plans ()
- Fundamental principles and concepts of information security incident management ()
- Information security incident management process based on ISO/IEC 27035 ()
The 80 practice questions for the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27035 Lead Incident Manager exam at CertkingdomPDF are organized around these objective areas, so your review time maps directly onto what the exam actually tests.
The ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager exam contains 80 questions and allows 180 minutes minutes to complete them. That works out to limited time per question, so practicing under similar time pressure beforehand helps you pace yourself on the real day.
PECB lists the following training options for candidates preparing for the ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager exam:
Many candidates combine official training with self-paced practice questions so they can both learn the material and rehearse the exam format.
Basic knowledge of information security principles, incident management processes, and ISO/IEC 27000 series standards recommended
Yes. CertkingdomPDF provides a free demo for the ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager exam product, and all demos on the site are free of charge. The PDF demo can be downloaded to your device and printed out if you prefer reviewing on paper. Trying the demo first is the easiest way to confirm that the question style, difficulty, and layout match what you need for the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27035 Lead Incident Manager exam — no payment and no commitment required.
PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27035 Lead Incident Manager Sample Questions:
Scenario 8: Moneda Vivo, headquartered in Kuala Lumpur. Malaysia, is a distinguished name in the banking sector. It is renowned for its innovative approach to digital banking and unwavering commitment to information security. Moneda Vivo stands out by offering various banking services designed to meet the needs of its clients. Central to its operations is an information security incident management process that adheres to the recommendations of ISO/IEC 27035-1 and 27035-2.
Recently. Moneda Vivo experienced a phishing attack aimed at its employees Despite the bank's swift identification and containment of the attack, the incident led to temporary service outages and data access issues, underscoring the need for improved resilience The response team compiled a detailed review of the attack, offering valuable insights into the techniques and entry points used and identifying areas for enhancing their preparedness.
Shortly after the attack, the bank strengthened its defense by implementing a continuous review process to ensure its incident management procedures and systems remain effective and appropriate While monitoring the incident management process, a trend became apparent. The mean time between similar incidents decreased after a few occurrences; however, Moneda Vivo strategically ignored the trend and continued with regular operations This decision was rooted in a deep confidence in its existing security measures and incident management protocols, which had proven effective in quick detection and resolution of issues Moneda Vivo's commitment to transparency and continual improvement is exemplified by its utilization of a comprehensive dashboard. This tool provides real time insights into the progress of its information security incident management, helping control operational activities and ensure that processes stay within the targets of productivity, quality, and efficiency. However, securing its digital banking platform proved challenging.
Following a recent upgrade, which included a user interface change to its digital banking platform and a software update, Moneda Vivo recognized the need to immediately review its incident management process for accuracy and completeness. The top management postponed the review due to financial and time constraints.
Based on scenario 8, Moneda Vivo ignored the trend and continued regular operations when the mean time between the same types of incidents decreased after a few occurrences. Is this acceptable?
- A. When the mean time between the same types of incidents decreases after a few occurrences, it shows that the incidents are becoming less significant
- B. No, when the mean time between the same types of incidents decreases, a study should be necessary to confirm that the incidents are unrelated
- C. No, when the mean time between the same types of incidents decreases, a study should be conducted to discover why
Correct Answer: C 🗳️
Explanation: Only visible for CertkingdomPDF members. You can sign-up / login (it's free).
Scenario 6: EastCyber has established itself as a premier cyber security company that offers threat detection, vulnerability assessment, and penetration testing tailored to protect organizations from emerging cyber threats. The company effectively utilizes ISO/IEC 27035*1 and 27035-2 standards, enhancing its capability to manage information security incidents.
EastCyber appointed an information security management team led by Mike Despite limited resources, Mike and the team implemented advanced monitoring protocols to ensure that every device within the company's purview is under constant surveillance This monitoring approach is crucial for covering everything thoroughly, enabling the information security and cyber management team to proactively detect and respond to any sign of unauthorized access, modifications, or malicious activity within its systems and networks.
In addition, they focused on establishing an advanced network traffic monitoring system This system carefully monitors network activity, quickly spotting and alerting the security team to unauthorized actions This vigilance is pivotal in maintaining the integrity of EastCyber's digital infrastructure and ensuring the confidentiality, availability, and integrity of the data it protects.
Furthermore, the team focused on documentation management. They meticulously crafted a procedure to ensure thorough documentation of information security events. Based on this procedure, the company would document only the events that escalate into high-severity incidents and the subsequent actions. This documentation strategy streamlines the incident management process, enabling the team to allocate resources more effectively and focus on incidents that pose the greatest threat.
A recent incident involving unauthorized access to company phones highlighted the critical nature of incident management. Nate, the incident coordinator, quickly prepared an exhaustive incident report. His report detailed an analysis of the situation, identifying the problem and its cause. However, it became evident that assessing the seriousness and the urgency of a response was inadvertently overlooked.
In response to the incident, EastCyber addressed the exploited vulnerabilities. This action started the eradication phase, aimed at systematically eliminating the elements of the incident. This approach addresses the immediate concerns and strengthens EastCyber's defenses against similar threats in the future.
Based on scenario 6, EastCyber's team established a procedure for documenting only the information security events that escalate into high-severity incidents. According to ISO/IEC 27035-1, is this approach acceptable?
- A. The standard suggests that organizations document only events that classify as high-severity incidents
- B. No, because documentation should only occur post-incident to avoid any interference with the response process
- C. No, they should use established guidelines to document events and subsequent actions when the event is classified as an information security incident
Correct Answer: C 🗳️
Explanation: Only visible for CertkingdomPDF members. You can sign-up / login (it's free).
Scenario 3: L&K Associates is a graphic design firm headquartered in Johannesburg, South Africa. It specializes in providing innovative and creative design solutions to clients across various industries. With offices in multiple parts of the country, they effectively serve clients, delivering design solutions that meet their unique needs and preferences.
In its commitment to maintaining information security, L&K Associates is implementing an information security incident management process guided by ISO/IEC 27035-1 and ISO/IEC 27035-2. Leona, the designated leader overseeing the implementation of the incident management process, customized the scope of incident management to align with the organization's unique requirements. This involved specifying the IT systems, services, and personnel involved in the incident management process while excluding potential incident sources beyond those directly related to IT systems and services.
According to scenario 3, Leona decided to initially include only the elements provided in Clause 4.3 of ISO
/IEC 27035-2, Information security incident management policy content, in the incident management policy.
Is this acceptable?
- A. Yes, because Leona has conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify potential gaps in the incident management policy beyond the scope of clause 4.3 of ISO/IEC 27035-2
- B. Yes, because as a minimum, the policy must cover the elements provided in clause 4.3 of ISO/IEC
27035-2 - C. No, clause 4.3 of ISO/IEC 27035-2 does not cover elements for an effective incident management policy
Correct Answer: B 🗳️
Explanation: Only visible for CertkingdomPDF members. You can sign-up / login (it's free).
Which action is NOT involved in the process of improving controls in incident management?
- A. Implementing new or updated controls
- B. Updating the incident management policy
- C. Documenting risk assessment results
Correct Answer: C 🗳️
Explanation: Only visible for CertkingdomPDF members. You can sign-up / login (it's free).
Scenario 7: Located in central London, Konzolo has become a standout innovator in the cryptocurrency field.
By introducing its unique cryptocurrency, Konzolo has contributed to the variety of digital currencies and prioritized enhancing the security and reliability of its offerings.
Konzolo aimed to enhance its systems but faced challenges in monitoring the security of its own and third- party systems. These issues became especially evident during an incident that caused several hours of server downtime This downtime was primarily caused by a third-party service provider that failed to uphold strong security measures, allowing unauthorized access.
In response to this critical situation, Konzolo strengthened its information security infrastructure. The company initiated a comprehensive vulnerability scan of its cryptographic wallet software, a cornerstone of its digital currency offerings The scan revealed a critical vulnerability due to the software using outdated encryption algorithms that are susceptible to decryption by modern methods that posed a significant risk of asset exposure Noah, the IT manager, played a central role in this discovery With careful attention to detail, he documented the vulnerability and communicated the findings to the incident response team and management.
Acknowledging the need for expertise in navigating the complexities of information security incident management. Konzolo welcomed Paulina to the team. After addressing the vulnerability and updating the cryptographic algorithms, they recognized the importance of conducting a thorough investigation to prevent future vulnerabilities. This marked the stage for Paulina s crucial involvement. She performed a detailed forensic analysis of the incident, employing automated and manual methods during the collection phase. Her analysis provided crucial insights into the security breach, enabling Konzolo to understand the depth of the vulnerability and the actions required to mitigate it.
Paulina also played a crucial role in the reporting phase, as her comprehensive approach extended beyond analysis. By defining clear and actionable steps for future prevention and response, she contributed significantly to developing a resilient information security incident management system based on ISO/IEC
27035-1 and 27035-2 guidelines. This strategic initiative marked a significant milestone in Konzolo's quest to strengthen its defenses against cyber threats Based on scenario 7, which phase of forensic analysis did Paulina fail to conduct correctly?
- A. Collection
- B. Reporting
- C. Analysis
Correct Answer: A 🗳️
Explanation: Only visible for CertkingdomPDF members. You can sign-up / login (it's free).
Viewing page 1 out of 16 pages.
Viewing questions 1-5 out of 80 questions.





